CAS204 Assessment 1 Essay Preparation Template

ASSESSMENT 1: ESSAY PLAN TEMPLATE

The main government documents (may be one or two) I am using to describe the context and my target cohort are:

1)

2)

Journal articles or newspaper articles that I will use in addition to the required readings in weeks 1, 2, & 3 (APA format) are:

1)

2)

3)

These journal articles will be used in the sections on <insert section> and <insert section>.

The definition of multiculturalism and/or diversity I am going to use in this paper is from <insert author name> and is as follows.  “<insert quote>”  (Author, year, p. x).

These concepts are important in community services <insert reason>

The target group/cohort I will be focusing on is <insert target group/cohort> and the key definition and description of this target group/cohort includes <insert definition and description>.

The key historical structurally oppressive issue (ie social/cultural norm, legislation, policy) that I have chosen is <insert choice>. the key definition and description of this issue can be described as <insert description> with the intention and impact to <insert intention and impact of your chosen issue>

Get Your Customize Task on any subject starting 10$/Page

Order Now Whatsapp Now

I will <insert agree or disagree> in my essay that historical approaches, such as <insert example> and <insert example> described by <insert author> as being about <insert contemporary oppressive issue related to target cohort or group> and having the following nature and impact <insert nature and impact> <insert has or has not> impacted inclusion in society and <insert does or does not> have implications for community services sector today. I will support this with research by using the following key authors from the required readings and my additional research:

1.

2.

The two key concepts I am going to use to justify my position are:

1. <insert concept > and is described by <insert author> as <insert brief description> .

Important features of this concept are:

1. <insert feature>
2. <insert feature>
3. <insert feature>

I argue this because according to <insert author> the target cohort experience <insert experience> by <insert details of experience>.

This is supported by the following evidence:

1. <insert quotes or language>
2. <insert statistics>
3. <insert the affect on people>

The implications for community services are:

1. <insert implication>
2. <insert implication>
3. <insert implication>

This is supported by the following evidence:

2. <insert quotes or language>
3. <insert statistics>
4. <insert the affect on people>
5. <insert concept 2> and is described by <insert author> as <insert brief description> .

Important features of this concept are:

1. <insert feature>
2. <insert feature>
3. <insert feature>

I argue this because according to <insert author> the target cohort experience <insert experience> by <insert details of experience>.

This is supported by the following evidence:

1. <insert quotes or language>
2. <insert statistics>
3. <insert the affect on people>

The implications for community services are:

1. <insert implication>
2. <insert implication>
3. <insert implication>

This is supported by the following evidence:

1. <insert quotes or language>
2. <insert statistics>
3. <insert the affect on people>

Summary and conclusion.

In this paper I have analysed <insert key historical approaches, legislation, events to a key target cohort of people>. I have identified a key target group/cohort who were impacted and I have provided an argument as to whether I <insert agree or disagree> as to whether these <insert events or factors> are still impacting on inclusion today in society and the implications for community services.

I have justified my position by discussing and applying <insert concept 1> and <insert concept 2> to show that the key target group, <insert target group>, still <insert face or do not face> inclusion issues in society  today. I have evidenced this by <insert summary of the two concepts>.

In conclusion, this is my community services worker-based judgement of Australia’s historical approach to multiculturalism, diversity and inclusion and how it impacts on inclusion in our sector today.