2025-SOC3SOC: Assessment 2: Analytic Journals Part 2 - Details & Instructions

For the second journal, you are required to write a critical analysis focused on readings of Module 2 or Module 3 (Weeks 4-11).

In this journal, you will critique an argument or theory by analysing, judging, responding to and evaluating it in relation to themes, topics and issues covered in this subject.

You can start with a brief introduction and summary of the argument/theory, but do not make this the focus of your journal; the main content of this journal should be allocated to explaining, expanding and evidencing your critical analysis.

For this journal, you are encouraged to identify a core critical perspective or point of view that you can expand into a complex analytical argument, explain in-depth and support with evidence. Per the grading criteria, journal #2 will be assessed on your critique's analytical and academic quality rather than the number of critiques you identify/make.

You are required to undertake additional research for this journal and use a minimum of 4 academic sources.This research shouldinform your critique, i.e., ensure your arguments meet academic conventions and standards by supporting them with theory and evidence.

Your evidence must include academic literature, but you can also point to real-world examples (something in the news, popular culture, the arts, etc) that illustrate your insights. Additionally, you can construct your argument by applying the theory to a real world example that enables you to draw out a critical analysis and critique.

What is a Critique?

A critique is a systematic way of objectively reviewing a theory/argument to highlight its strengths and weaknesses and its applicability/value for sociological analysis. A critical analysis does not have to be negative, but it will typically have a position or point of view.

Perspectives that might be considered in a critique – What are the strengths and limitations? – Are there important factors or issues it overlooks? – How well does the theory account for the issue it aims to describe/ analyse? – Are there alternative theories or explanations that offer a more compelling account of these issues? - What can it not explain?

Please note these are just examples of questions that can be addressed in a critique, not a suggested journal layout. If you use these questions as a guide to generate ideas, please remember to focus on developing an in depth analysis and identifying implications related to themes covered in SOC3SOC.

Additional questions and prompts in the Week 7 block can be used to generate ideas for this assessment.

Preparing for Journal #2

• The tip sheet (linked in the resources section) provides detailed advice for sociological analysis and guidance on achieving high marks.

• Week 4–7 tutorials explore existing critiques of theories in the readings—these are excellent for idea development.

• Week 5 tutorials cover core skills in critiquing academic theories and approaches for developing critical analytical arguments.

• Your Journal #1 feedback is designed to support your preparation for Journal #2.

• A recorded essay writing tutorial (available in the essay details block) includes helpful strategies for building in-depth sociological analyses and arguments.

• Further details and the submission portal for Journal #2 are located in the Week 7 block.