Writing A Critical Evaluation
Critical Analysis Assignment Help Australia-Assignment Studio
Students often misunderstand the term critical and consider it as negative; relating it to finding fault, judging or condemning, disparaging. However, it is completely opposite. A critical evaluation is positive as it analyze, assess, interpret and explain. Critically evaluating information is crucial and necessary skill for postgraduate researchers as it allows identifying errors and inconsistencies in reasoning. In addition, it is specifically relevant in academic setting when working on essays, presentation and research papers. Students are asked to incorporate critical analysis as a part and at times as a stand-alone assignment. Dealing with such assignments can be challenging, and compel students to seek online assignment help from qualified experts. Our experts have created a guide so that students can get know-how of it, and meanwhile get writing assistance from matched online assignment expert. Critical evaluation can’t be duplicated, yet it is one’s own response to an answer. Still, the writer runs the document for plagiarism checker such as Turnitin to assure quality check. You get the quality work, prior the deadline with unlimited revision from subject matter specialist and all at affordable price, then what else are you looking for? Take our assignment help once and see how we enter your list of best my assignment services.
Learn How To Write A Good Critical Evaluation With Our Online Assignment Experts
Learning how to write is not a one-day job. Students must make a use of these techniques when ever they are asked to write critical evaluation, as practicing allows to hold a grip on particular matter. The online assignment expert offers a short guide along with the excellent assignment help services they offer. No wonder, this will be useful at the end of a day.
For critical evaluation, make the use of ‘PROMPT’ system which stands for:
P-provenance
R: Relevance
O: Objectivity
M: Method
P: Presentation
T: Timeliness
This is a structured approach to critically evaluate the information.
Provenance
Provenance of an information (For instance, who have produced it? Form where it has been taken?) may give valuable clue to its reliability. To add, it signifies the ‘credentials’ of an information piece that supports the perceived value and its status. That’s the reason, it is imperative to identify the author name, sponsoring body, or the material or the source of information.
The factors which need to be considered about authors:
- They must be acknowledged professionals in the area of subject
- They must have written for reliable and respected publications
- Do they offer controversial views?
- Did any other author in the field have usually cited them? (Giving answer to this requires citation search or prior knowledge)
- Do they have any specific perspective on the topic?
The factors which need to be considered about sponsoring organizations:
- The organization type; is it a voluntary organization, commercial company or a research organization?
- How deep-rooted or well established that organization is?
- Do the organizations hold vested interest in the area of subject that is been researched?
The factors which need to be considered about the method of publication:
- Individual can post to a list of discussion or publish anything on the World Wide Web. The author’s credentials have to be judged on merit.
- What information do you have of the editorial board or editor, also how the editorial policy is successful in influencing what will be published?
- Is the journal well considered? In the Journal Citation Report, does this have a high rating?
- The collected information is peer reviewed as peer review process is not available in various electronic journals.
The provenance of information doesn’t give a straight clue to its quality. The ‘stable theory’, proposes that academic work is appreciated mainly because it is published in prominent journal or originated from prominent research group. Information should specifically be judged on merits. Moreover, provenance can easily impact other persons confidence in the cited sources.
Relevance
It is a crucial aspect of information quality which isn’t the property of the information itself, but somewhat its relationship is to the identified need. It is pertinent to the question asked or the search scope. Though there are number of ways it can be identified that the information might or might not be relevant to the needs.
- Geographical; it is linked to the areas or countries that you may not be interested in.
- Level; it can be specialized or too simple for the work level.
- Emphasis; it might not hold the information type looked for and may not be recognized from the abstract.
Determining relevance can be easy through; when
- Clear on requirements – allows you to omit irrelevant things.
- Avoid full readings- consider the title, descriptors, keywords, abstract or summary. When evaluating large body source or material, scan or skim the information to gain quick indication of what the matter is about.
Objectivity
Balanced or objective information presents all arguments and evidence, and allows weighing up and drawing the conclusions. However, in reality, it is identified that the presented information relies around the position of interest, though it might be unintentional. Therefore, attaining objectivity can be an unattainable ideal.
It indicates that concern is on the readers’ side to build critical awareness of presented position in the reading material, and taking account of it when the interpreting the information. It is significant to identify that own opinions and belief systems influence the ability to evaluate the information objectively.
While in few cases, the authors may explicitly express a specific perspective, it is seamlessly valid till they are explicit about the presented viewpoint. Errors or out of sight bias of omission, even if it is deliberate, could be misleading. Take in the below elements:
- Perspectives: Does the author consider viewpoints are clear?
- Opinions: Articles often deliver unsubstantiated theories. Take heed for the given opinions as if it were the fact.
- Language: It may acts as a valuable risk sign. Take heed for language which is either vague or emotionally charged.
- Sponsorship: Can be personal, political or commercial. For instance, governments or organization may sponsor the research on academic matter. It may not necessarily state that the research is less objective but can make the interpretation to be selective. Ensure that the vested interests are identified clearly; also sponsors are happily willing to provide the actual research data.
While producing a literature review, it is important to identify any selective data interpretation. Comment on omitted significance in other authors findings that you encounter.
Method
Particularly for this feature of PROMPT, it doesn’t refer to the research evaluation methods intrinsically, however to the information which is produced due to the use of specific method. Think on the following, with the method knowledge used in subject area;
- The process of how the research was done is clear.
- Did they use appropriate methods?
- Make some simple questions on questionnaire design, control group or sample size.
- With the methods stated or used, are the produced results consistent?
- Does the method suits your needs? Are you looking for the method similar or different to yours?
Never assume that research which is published meet specific standard or is free of errors. Because there have been many cases of research which were fraud; also they have mislead the research establishment that is published in journals of high credit rating.
Presentation
Presentation of information has an intense impact on the way it’s received and perceived. Also, there are various presentation aspects and if not presented well accordingly, it will form a wall between the audience and the message. For instance;
- The selection of writing font size and type
- Usage of images as well as diagrams
- Poor layout or illogical structure
- Improper use of writing style and language
Know well that inappropriate use of language and poor presentation will hamper individual ability to make critical evaluation to the academic content.
Timeliness
The time in terms of date the information was published or produced is a crucial aspect of quality. However, it isn’t as uncomplicated as saying that authentic information or data has to be up-to-date; it actually relies upon the information needed.
The three important factors to consider are:
- Are you clear on when (date) the information was produced?
- Do your requirements meet with the information date?
- Is it outdated?
Why choose Assignment studio for Critical Evaluation Online Assignment Help
