Leadership Effectiveness in Organizations | Assignment Help
Introduction
The aim of this report is to highlight leadership effectiveness in organizational frameworks. The text also sheds light on the healthy impact that a capable leader has on the organization’s performance. These discussions on the effective leaders will be backed by studies that highlight key leadership theories, concepts and models. Furthermore, leadership styles would also be discussed and a consensus on the most effective leadership style will be drawn. Finally, the essay will be concluded by drawing a reasonable assertion based on the most viable definition of an effective leader.
Chart your course to leadership mastery with Assignmentstudio. Our comprehensive Leadership Assignment Help service offers personalized assistance tailored to your needs, ensuring you develop the skills and insights necessary for effective leadership.
Leadership Theories
The role of an effective leader is integral to the organization’s operations (Sirisetti, 2011). Effective institutional leaders create empowering organizational cultures, clarify the organizational values and it’s objectives and also efficiently integrate all organizational resources to achieve the best outcomes for the company (Zeb, Ahmad, & Saeed, 2018). Furthermore, the leader also acts as a role model for his employees, keeps the employees adhered to their job commitments and is able to successfully mold their beliefs and values in coherence to the organization’s needs (Hao & Yazdanifard, 2015). This enables the company to successfully achieve it’s goals and increase it’s profitability.
Effective leaders possess certain personality traits that makes them a suitable fit for the management position. These traits include drive, honesty and integrity, leadership motivation, self-confidence and cognitive ability. The trait theory defines drive as the energy, the ambition and the tenacity to achieve the organizational objectives. Furthermore, it also includes the initiative-taking capability. The persistence of this drive determines the success of the organization. Honesty and integrity has been defined as the ability of the manager to pursue ethical/moral leadership and execute his tasks with utter trustworthiness (Ahmed & Bach, 2014). Research suggests that honesty was ranked as the most powerful attribute when leadership effectiveness was measured. Hence, this is one of the most powerful personality traits (Wieck, Prydun, & Walsh, 2002).
Leadership motivation has been described as the ability to lead and avoid the misuse of power. This trait is essential since it encourages the employees and enables them to practice commitment and persistence (Naile & Selesho, 2014). Furthermore, it also creates a positive environment that increases the employees’ productivity. Self-confidence has been linked to the idea of the leader having emotional stability, extraversion, stress tolerance, sociability and a sense of alignment to the vision. The adherence to the vision is particularly important for the leader since he uses his own core beliefs, values and guiding principles to influence the labor class working under him (Flynn & G, 2008). Lastly, cognitive ability has been defined as the ability of an individual to be more conscientious and open to experiences. The cognitive ability would enable the leaders to confidently develop strategies, engage into problem-solving, motivate employees and closely monitor the environment. Moreover, leaders with greater cognition also have powerful analytical skills hence, they are able to gather, integrate and interpret bundles of information in a short span of time. Therefore, possessing this trait would enhance the effectiveness of the leader to a great level (Ahmed & Bach, 2014).
One essential consideration in the Trait Theory has been highlighted by (Zaccaro, 2007), who came up with the multistage Model of Leadership. The researcher considered the ‘interaction with the environment’ as an integral characteristic in the development of an effective leader. Furthermore, he developed the model on two fundamental premises. The first premise stated that the effective leadership qualities is a result of a combined set of traits, instead of just separate, independent traits (Nyukorong & Quisenberry, 2016). For instance, a constellation of social and cognitive qualities would create an impactful leader. Cognitive ability without social competence would fail to depict an effective leader (Zaccaro, 2007). Furthermore, the second premise of the multi-stage model states that the leadership characteristics may largely vary depending on the consequent proximal effect on leadership This means that certain traits such as cognitive and personal qualities etc. serve as potential precursors for the development of further advanced personality traits. Moreover, the model also highlights some intrinsic leadership traits which includes decision-making, problem-solving skills, creativity, flexibility and managerial skills etc. (Nyukorong & Quisenberry, 2016).
By combining multiple traits like need for achievement, assertiveness, intelligence, task competence, responsibility, adaptability, decisiveness, trustworthiness, the trait theory remains a successful measure in ensuring that these traits prove to create effective leaders in organizational frameworks. These personality traits would enable the leaders to manage the employees efficiently, increase employee satisfaction, elevate organizational performance and profitability and motivate all the employees to stay adhered to the organization’s mission, vision and objectives (Fleenor, 2006)
Trait Theory has proven to be an effective determinant of effective leaders in organization, however in certain situations the theory fails to achieve it’s aim. One of such instances may be when a leader derails on the job by failing to exploit his full potential. Studies show that around 47 percent of people in leadership positions end up falling in this bracket. Those leaders may be low on integrity, honesty, conscientious and extroversion etc. thereby yielding a low level of personality traits (Parr, Lanza, & Bernthal, 2016). Furthermore, trait theory identifies a number of traits that should be present in effective leaders, however, arguments on the most effective leadership traits are still pertinent. Hence, the trait theory fails to predict one exact definition of a successful leader. Moreover, there has been several studies that defy the concept of the trait theory. One such study by Ralph Melvin Stogdill asserted that leadership skills are not based on predefined qualities, in fact it is based on social and situational interaction (Cherry, 2019). Hence, it can be affirmed that trait theory is an effective way to justify successful leadership, however, it is not the best way to define it.
Leadership Styles
In today’s competitive world, most of the great organizations possess brilliant leaders who are well-versed at monitoring and supervising the employee’s performance. An excellent leader will enable the employees to become more dynamic and proactive, thereby increasing the productivity of the work executed. Therefore, the leadership styles pursued by various leaders are a core consideration in influencing the organizational culture and performance (Carnes, Houghton, & Ellison, 2015).
There are a wide variety of leadership styles that managers adapt in order to become more effective. This may vary from an autocratic approach to a democratic, entrepreneurial, servant and a narcissistic approach. However, the most common amongst these are the autocratic and democratic styles. Leaders who adapt the autocratic style tend to exercise power and authority at a greater level. These managers do not engage their employees in the decision-making process, use a structured and a fixed system of rewards and punishments to influence their employees and communicate in the form of instructions and orders. Under such a leadership, a disciplined work place is established and clear instructions are given on the tasks to be executed. The manager may employ both the positive and negative reinforcements depending on the employees’ code of conduct. This kind of leadership style tends to maintain stability instead of introducing change and aims at attaining specific goals for both the leader and the employees (Lussier & Achua, 2004). This style may elevate leadership effectiveness since the positive reinforcements used by the leader may enable the employees to adapt the correct behavior and properly endeavor to achieve the goals (Alia, Janggaa, Ismaila, Kamala, & Alib, 2015)
On the other hand, the democratic style of leadership is described as the ability of the manager to encourage intellectual simulation through inspiration and motivation. This leadership style enables the employees to be a part of the decision-making and achieve extraordinary outcome through their own hard work. The managers following this style, delegate work responsibilities to all the employees and establish a positive work environment by boosting employee satisfaction, employee morale and team spirit. The employees’ productivity increases since they attain a sense of freedom to work on the goals and stay coordinated with their manager. These leaders encourage their subordinates to exploit their full potential and elevate their aspirations for the benefit of the organization. Furthermore, the employees adhere to their commitments in this kind of a work place since, they have an opportunity to showcase their creativity and hard work at a greater level (Khan, Khan, Afaq, & Ismail, 2015). Managers adapting to the democratic style of leadership are effective managers since they are able to boost employee’s self-confidence and their satisfaction, thereby enhancing the organizational performance and the adherence to the organizational goals (Alia, Janggaa, Ismaila, Kamala, & Alib, 2015).
After carrying out a thorough research on the leadership styles it can be asserted that the best leadership style is the one which combines both the autocratic and the democratic styles. A successful leader would be the one who would set specific goals and targets and encourage employees to meet them via a system of rewards and punishments, while simultaneously inspiring and motivating the followers. Secondly, an effective leader will be the one who is able to change his style from autocratic to democratic when needed (Aarons, 2007). He would adapt an autocratic role when the employees need extrinsic motivation and he would switch to a democratic role whenever the employees are in need of a charismatic and a visionary role model. Hence, there is no fixed definition of an optimum leadership style
Conclusion
Every organization has a different standard of work attitudes, employee behaviors, management perceptions and client outcomes. Hence, every institutional framework has a unique definition of a successful leader who would serve as an asset for their firm. On a general level, an effective leader will be the one who possesses personality traits and task-related traits that are required to guide, inspire and motivate the employees and that would enable them to adhere to the organizational goals and objectives. An effective leader would have the talent to switch leadership styles according to the worker’s needs and changing situations. Hence an organization will have an effective leader when all of the above characteristics enlighten the leader’s personality and he is able to achieve the organization’s mission, vision and objectives.
Master the art of leadership essay writing with Assignmentstudio. Our dedicated team meticulously examines the theme of Essay on Leadership, crafting impactful content that resonates with readers and inspires critical thinking.
References
Aarons, G. A. (2007). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: Association With Attitudes Towards Evidence based practice. US National Library of Medicine, 57(4), 1162-1169.
Ahmed, A., & Bach, C. (2014). Major Traits/Qualities of Leadership. Internation Journal Of Innovation and Scientiffic Research, 3(1), 47-53.
Alia, N. M., Janggaa, R., Ismaila, M., Kamala, S. N.-l., & Alib, M. N. (2015). Influence Of Leadership Styles In Creating Quality Work Culture. Procedia Economics and Finance , 161-169.
Carnes, A., Houghton, J. H., & Ellison, C. N. (2015). What matters most in the leadership selection? The role of personality and Implicit Leadership Theories. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Development, 36(4), 360-379.
Cherry, K. (2019, May 7). Understanding the Trait theory of Leadership. Retrieved from verywell mind: https://www.verywell.com/what-is-the-trait-theory-of-leadership-2795322
Farhan, B. Y. (2018). Application Of Path-Goal Leadership Theory And Learning Theory In A Learning Organization. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 34(1), 13-32.
Fleenor, J. (2006). Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Sage.
Flynn, & G. (2008). The Virtuous Manager: A vision for leadership in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 359-372.
Gill, R. (2011). Theory and Practice of leadership (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Hao, M. J., & Yazdanifard, D. (2015). How Effective Leadership can Facilitate Change in Organizations through improvement and innovation. Global Journal of management and Business Research, 15(9), 1.
J, S., & Zacarro. (2001). The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success. American Psychological Association.
Khan, I., & Nawaz, A. (2016). A comparitive Analysis of Leadership theories: A Review. Gomal University Journal of Research.
Khan, S., Khan, I., Afaq, Q., & Ismail, H. M. (2015). The styles of Leadership: A critical Review. Public Policy and Administration Research, 5(3).
Kovach, M. (2018). An Examination of Leadership theories in Business and Sport Achievement Context. The Journal of Value-based Leadership, 11(1).
Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. F. (2004). Leadership: Theory, Application and skill development. Mason: Southwest.
Martin. (2019, January 27). Leadership and the contingency Theory. Retrieved from Cleverism: https://www.cleverism.com/leadership-and-the-contingency-theory/
Nahavandi, A. (2015). The Art and Science of Leadership (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Naile, I., & Selesho, J. M. (2014). The Role of Leadership in employee motivation. Mediteranean journal of social sciences, 5(3), 175-182.
Nyukorong, R., & Quisenberry, W. (2016). Character Traits Of Effective Executives: A phenomenal study of CEOS in Ghana. European Scientiffic Journal, 12(20), 69-84.
Parr, A. D., Lanza, S. T., & Bernthal, P. (2016). Personality Profiles of Effective Leadership Performance in Assesment Centers. Hum Perform, 29(2), 143-157.
Sirisetti, S. (2011). QUALITY LEADERSHIP IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR:. The Journal of Commerce, 3(4), 45-48.
Wieck, K. L., Prydun, M., & Walsh, T. (2002). What the emerging workforce wants in it’s leaders. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(3), 283-288.
Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based Perspectives of Leadership. American Psychological Association, 62(1), 6-16.
Zeb, A., Ahmad, S., & Saeed, G. (2018). Leadership Effectiveness and Organizational Performance: Exploring gaps in the Existing Literature. Business and Economic Review, 10(1), 95-106.
Zeithamal, V. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Zeithaml, C. P. (37-64). The Contingency Approach: It’s foundations and Relevance to Theory Building and Research in Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 22(7).
