Auditing Report Assignment Help
Executive Summary
In this report, I’m trying to investigate and report on the true and fair value of the financial statements of ALTIUM LIMITED which is an American, Australian-domiciled owned public software company that provides PC-based electronics design software, through risk-based auditing approach. Risk-based auditing is a style of auditing which focuses upon the analysis and management of risk. A traditional audit would focus upon the transactions which would make up financial statements such as the balance sheet. A risk-based approach will seek to identify risks with the greatest potential impact. An experiment suggested that managers might respond to risk-based auditing by transferring activity to accounts which are ostensibly low risk. Auditors would need to anticipate such attempts to game the process. It has been suggested in research the tone of an annual report reflects factors that auditors consider in assessing audit risk. To conclude the summary, I would say that this report is investigative in nature in the sense that it involves the risk impact and relationship of different ASA (Australian Auditing Standards) with auditing theories, concepts, regulations such as business risk, corporate governance, inherent and control risks, reporting obligation of auditors, auditor’s negligence and contributory negligence, auditors independence, duties and continuity through findings that are gathered by a mix of flow of information through company’s financial statements, Independent Audit report and important details given in “Key Audit Matters”. Also, to give a little overview of the company during the last fiscal year, some important figures should be noted:
Problem Statement
Brief Overview of Company
Altium Limited is an American, Australian-domiciled owned public software company that provides PC-based electronics design software for engineers who design printed circuit boards. Financial year 2020 has proven to be an exceptional year. Altium began the year with the momentum of recent years rapid growth and was well on the way to achieve its goal to become the clear market leader in the PCB design tool industry and from that position of strength to enter a new phase of industry dominance and industry transformation (Annual Report , 2020).
Problems in Financial Statements
Following the above-mentioned objective, we have identified the following problems through investigating financial statements and audit report of the company:
Misstatement of revenue
The company is involved in providing number of different services i.e. different performance obligations. IFRS15 revenue from contracts with customers requires that the transaction price shall pe allocated between each performance obligation based on standalone selling price of each performance obligation. There is a risk management has not appropriately allocated the transaction price resulting in misstatement of revenue.
Further, the basis for allocating transaction prices requires significant judgement to assess its reasonableness of stand-alone price is not readily available. This further increase the risk of misstatement.
The different performance obligation may have different points of recognition i.e. whether to recognize them over a time or at a point of time as per IFRS15 revenue from contracts with customers. There’s a risk that management might not have recorded the revenue as per the recognition criteria of IFRS leading to misstatement of revenue (IFRS Organisation ).
Overstatement of other receivables
|
2020 |
2020 |
Variance in $ 000 |
Variance in % |
Trade receivables |
59,454
|
45,404
|
14,050
|
31%
|
Receivables written off during the year as uncollectable |
224 |
274 |
(50) |
18.3% |
During the year 2020, trade receivables excluding other receivables have increased by $ 14.1 million i.e. 31% whereas the revenue has increased by $17.32 million (10%) there is the risk of overstatement of trade receivables as the trade receivables may include long due outstanding balances which may require provision for doubtful debt or may need to be written off.
The receivable written off have decreased by the 18.3% despite the increase in trade receivable balance. This decrease enhances our risk of overstatement of trade receivable.
Misstatement of Provision
Provision for ECL |
610 |
369 |
241 |
65% |
Receivable 3 to 6 months overdue |
286
|
62
|
224
|
361%
|
As the aging of trade receivable, the amount of 3 to 6 months overdue has shown the significant increase of 361% whereas the provision for expected credit loss has shown
increase of 65%. This indicates the risk of understatement of provision as management may not have recorded adequate provision as per “IAS 37 provisions and contingent liabilities”.
Many measurements based on estimates are inherently imprecise and subjective in nature and involves significant judgements and assumption. Since the measurement of provision is an estimate, there is the risk that these judgements and assumptions may not be reasonable enhancing the risk of misstatement of provision (Annual Report , 2020).
Hire Expert Writers at
Affordable Price
WhatsApp
Get Assignment Help
Methodology
Risk-based Auditing Approach
IIA defines risk based internal auditing (RBIA) as a methodology that links internal auditing to an organization’s overall risk management framework. RBIA allows internal audit to provide assurance to the board that risk management processes are managing risks effectively, in relation to the risk appetite. Every organization is different, with a different attitude to risk, different structure, different processes and different language. Experienced internal auditors need to adapt these ideas to the structures, processes and language of their organization in order to implement RBIA. RBIA seeks at every stage to reinforce the responsibilities of management and the board for managing risk. If the risk management framework is not very strong or does not exist, the organization is not ready for RBIA. More importantly, it means that the organization’s system of internal control is poor. Internal auditors in such an organization should promote good risk management practice to improve the system of internal control ( Maycock , 2014).
Identifying and analysing audit risks
As per “ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment” auditor is required to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial report and assertion levels, through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control, thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks of material misstatement.
Overview of Audit risk
Audit risk is the risk that an auditor will not detect errors or fraud while examining the financial statements of a client.
The three types of audit risk are as follows:
- Control risk. This is the risk that potential material misstatements would not be detected or prevented by a client’s control systems.
- Detection risk. This is the risk that the audit procedures used are not capable of detecting a material misstatement.
- Inherent risk. This is the risk that a client’s financial statements are susceptible to material misstatements (Ali, 2020).
Business risk
Business risk is defined in ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and its Environment. The definition states that business risk is a risk resulting from significant conditions, events, circumstances, actions or inactions which could adversely affect an entity’s ability to achieve its objectives and execute its strategies, or from the setting of inappropriate objectives and strategies (Auditing Standard ASA 315). Risk of material misstatement is defined in ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with ASAs as the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated prior to audit. Risk of material misstatement comprises inherent risk and control risk (Auditing Standard ASA 200).
Business risks can be broken down into operational risk, financial risk and compliance risk. Each of these components can have a direct impact on the financial statements, and therefore understanding the components of business risk can help the auditor to identify risks of misstatement, and to design a response to that risk (Corporate Finance Institiute ).
Financial, Compliance and Regulatory risk
Altium operates in many countries around the world and is subject to multiple regulatory and compliance regimes. Altium’s ability to manage relations with key regulatory agencies in all the markets in which it operates, including Australia, Europe and the United States is essential to smooth operations. Altium works with several external experts world-wide to ensure compliance with specific accounting, compliance and regulatory reporting requirements, personal data privacy issues such as GDPR, tax and reporting in Australia and other markets as well as export control requirements worldwide (Annual Report , 2020). Here is also an issue arising in relation to ASA 250 Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements. ASA 250 requires that if the auditor becomes aware of information concerning an instance of non-compliance, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the act and the circumstances in which it has occurred. Further information to evaluate the possible effect on the financial statements should also be evaluated. Therefore, the audit plan should contain planned audit procedures which are sufficient for the audit team to conclude on the accounting treatment and on whether the auditor has any reporting responsibilities outside the Group, for example, to communicate a breach of international environmental protection legislation to the appropriate authorities (Auditing Standard ASA 250).
Ratio Analysis
Looking at the other ratios, the current ratio and gearing ratio do not indicate audit risks; however, more detail is needed to fully conclude on the liquidity and solvency position of the Group, and whether there are any hidden trends which are obscured by the high level analysis which has been performed with the information provided (Annual Report , 2020).
Consolidation of foreign subsidiaries
Given that the Group has many foreign subsidiaries, including the recent investment in Altium Software India Private Limited and Altium insurance Inc, audit risks relating to their consolidation are potentially significant. There are also audit risks relevant to the Group’s foreign subsidiaries on translation of these subsidiaries’ assets and income into group’s functional currency. According to IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, the assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries should be retranslated using the closing exchange rate. Its income and expenses should be retranslated at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. The risk is that incorrect exchange rates are used for the retranslations. This could result in over/understatement of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses which are consolidated, including goodwill. It would also mean that the exchange gains and losses arising on retranslation and to be included in group other comprehensive income are incorrectly determined. In addition, in case of mid-year acquisition, income and expenses should have been consolidated from that date. There is a risk that the full year’s income and expenses have been consolidated, leading to a risk of misstatement of Group profit (IAS Plus , 2009).
Analyzing exchange gains and losses
The calculation of exchange gains and losses can be complex, and there is a risk that it is not calculated correctly, or that some elements are omitted, for example, the exchange gain or loss on goodwill may be missed out of the calculation. IFRS 21 states that exchange gains and losses arising as a result of the retranslation of the subsidiary’s balances are recognized in other comprehensive income. The risk is incorrect classification, for example, the gain or loss could be recognized incorrectly as part of profit for the year (IAS Plus , 2009). The exchange gain recognized in the current year amounts to $ 1.4 million. It has shown a significant increase of $ 1.361 million indicating a potential risk of overstatement (Annual Report , 2020).
Navigate the intricacies of auditing assignments with Assignmentstudio! Our specialized Auditing Assignment Help guarantees clarity and precision in every task. Trust our expertise to elevate your understanding and performance in auditing studies!