Answering Problem Questions

Facing Difficulty When Answering Problem Questions Using IRAC Method? Take the best Online Assignment Help from Experts at Assignment Studio

Other than essay writing, a common form of assessment which many students come across is Answering problem solving questions. It is done through ILAC method which is a four-step structure:  Issue, Law, Application and Conclusion. Broadly, problem question involves set of given facts which are merely followed by an instruction to direct the potential parties on their rights and provide remedies to it. It is to assess conceptual subject-understanding of students. The reason is, it allows applying and practicing the law which every student isn’t aware of, at the beginning level. There are various approaches to solve legal problem, and this is one of the possible used method.  The professor assesses the knowledge of possibilities individuals have related to the facts which are thrown up. By this, it refers that one can see the problems that arise for consideration and then tackle it with structured legal manner. Students find it hard to work on, and seek assignment help from online assignment expert to score well. They are able to look deeply into the set of facts for legal issues and answer those using ILAC framework.  So, rather than scoring below average due to assignments like these, it’s advisable to take university assignment help from qualified subject-expert and meanwhile learn alongside on how it is done. This will save time and leave good impression on professor. At assignment Studio, we offer quality-oriented work which is assured through trusted plagiarism checker and delivered prior the deadline. So, get quality guaranteed answering problem question assignment now, at budget friendly rates.

Understand IRAC Method through Online Assignment Expert on This Platform

Basis for problem solving:

Two things must be specifically considered when solving law problems;

• Parties:

Look for the parties which are involved in the scenario and advise them.  They might be a company or public authority, however, most of the time the identity of parties are ambiguous.

• Relevant facts;

In basic problem solving questions, there is no such thing as irrelevant information as whatever is mentioned has happened. Consider an example of the sentence in a problem question:

“Charlie was walking over his house boundary when a charity worker came to him.”

It is just about placing the scene, and doesn’t direct to access of information which can be extracted.  

                                                                 

At the end, one must be able to state one useful thing about each sentence and if it gets complex then create an event timeline for each character, also it can help you adopt a chronological approach.   

• Giving answer to problem question:

The response to the introduction must not be long and a single paragraph between 100-150 words. This section allows the reader to know what the answer will cover;

• Disputed legal topic
• Topic analysis which include both arguments and counter-arguments.
• Giving advice to the people bearing in mind their success prospect in any legal action

Important to note:

 Do not repeat the specifics or any facts from scenario.  Just mention what is asked.

Learn How to Answer Through IRAC method and Achieve Top Grades – A Guaranteed My Assignment Services

The online assignment experts on this platform have explained how to answer problem questions through ILAC method which is as follow:

• Main Body Paragraph (IRAC method)

Law students are supposed to be familiar with IRAC formula. This approach is useful to structure the answer in a paragraph which doesn’t allow tracking off by addressing issues and applying law concerning the scenario.

IRAC stands for;

I – Issue

R – Rule

A – Application

C – Conclusion

• Issue:

The initial step is to pick up an issue from the given facts from the case where it is required to apply the law. The more one is aware of the laws, the easiest it becomes to identify the issue. Reading law cases is invaluable as it gives an insight into how judges commonly set out the facts and then sues on the legal base, which arise for consideration. Read the question carefully and highlight the areas of law involved. In general, it requires to address the parties who appears in the problem. Understand what party wants to know as the response reveal the legal issue for determination. If the plan has the scenarios structure, then the first sentence reveals the first issue. For example, problem question can start with the following sentence:

Anna was trying to sell her sofa set and made an advertisement on social media sites offering it for $300.

 In contract law, certainly a legal point can be made here like an invitation of treat.   The opening part has a single sentence where the reader may identify the scenario part that will be addressed.  Here is a clear restatement of the scenario.

Anna is trying to sell his sofa set on the social media sites for $300.

It is straight to the point. If question asks for more than one issue, then describe the exact problems which have to be considered for further analysis. 

• Rule:

Once the issue for determination is identified, using the ‘rule’ is other way to set out the applicable law to the issue. The issue is selected as there is a legal point to be made on it which directs that law of knowledge is demonstrated through cases or legislation. It is required to cite the relevant case law and constitutional provisions which represent the current legal position with respect to the raised issue. In the absence of authoritative source, persuasive sources must be cited such as foreign judgment/ obiter dicta.

At times there isn’t a settled point of law which decides a case.  Sometimes a conflicting authority is present with the result that the law is unclear.  Then, apply different conclusions to the facts of the case. Where there is unclear law, legal literature is present in which authors opinion are expressed as to what the law should be.  Here, the view must be noted and (substantiated) opinion can be express if the view is preferable to another.

Taking earlier example;

It is a case of an invitation to treat which indicates openness to negotiations, as can be seen in cases, like of Great Britain Ltd vs. Pharmaceutical Society Boots Cash Chemists [1953] and Partridge vs. Crittenden [1968]

 

• Application:

After identifying the issue and the relevant law to it, apply that particular law to the scenario facts. Students forget this part, but it is important to show that you not only understand the law but also demonstrating its relevancy to the scenario is a crucial aspect of answering problem questions.

Where there are complex questions or ambiguous facts, it provides an opportunity to explain both sides of argument. The law gives clear principles which should be followed, knowing the application of these principles might not be clear at times.  

An example is:

Anna tries to sell her sofa set is truly an invitation to treat, and indicates the initiation of negotiations, forwarding to creation of a contract.

Conclusion:

It is short and explains the importance of law application to the advised person. Basically, it is useful to frame the conclusion with respect to the identified issue and the question that have been asked. 

For complex scenarios, it is challenging to give a definitive answer. As long as the conclusion successfully explains case reasons and gives alternatives to the client, then what is expected has been achieved. The result shall not stop the person from taking out conclusion that can be taken forward.

So, any individual who replies to the advertisement and is willing to pay $300 is not entitled to the sofa as they are truly placing an offer to Anna that she can either take it or reject it.

Hope this gives a clear idea of how ILAC method is used to answer problem question. Still if it isn’t clear, take assignment help from our law expert and get your work done at finger tips.